How has it come to this? I vaguely remember, it must have been in 2014 or thereabouts, walking through a barrio of London, and seeing stickers for UKIP all over the place. I know, thanks to the accounts of friends, how present the National Front had always been in London and the UK, but it tended to be something clandestine, kept out of sight. A guilty secret. All of a sudden, there it was, out in the open. A fringe political cult which was being celebrated en masse. UKIP’s greatest victory, thus far, has been Brexit. But now Farage has finally become an MP, Musk is supposedly on the point of financing them and they loom larger than ever in the national consciousness. UKIP, rebranded as Reform, is a retrograde, divisive, nationalistic movement. It had no place in the Britain of yesteryear, of if it did, it was hidden away somewhere, the weasel under the cocktail cabinet.
Seymour’s book looks at the emergence of nationalist movements around the globe, many of them proto-fascist. He is well aware of the difficulties of defining someone or something as ‘fascist’ so treads the linguistic line carefully, using historical parallels to make his case. The book looks at selected aspects of the nationalist movement, from the Lone Wolf killer to genocidal regimes. His analysis looks at how power manipulates emotion, which, rather than the classic capitalist idea of self-advancement, he takes as the primary driver of human action. People will take decisions against their own better interests if they can be emotionally engaged. Hence, for example, Brexit. He also skewers the lie of the white working class as the prime mover for the nationalist movements: suggesting that the forces of nationalism have infiltrated society on a far more pervasive level. The current state of Israel being a prime example.
Most disturbingly, he shows how the logical culmination of the nationalist movement is a desire to expand borders, to create an other that needs to be conquered. Nationalism is about the “us” against the “them” and the uncontrolled barbarity of actions in Gaza, against muslims in India, in Rohingya, are evidence of how the manipulation of this idea can lead to a societal breakdown of the moral order. In an existential nationalist conflict, there are no limits: indeed the more extreme and barbaric the actions of the neurotic nationalist force, the more it satiates the bloodlust of ‘its’ peoples.
“Disaster nationalism today harnesses the insecurity, humiliation and miseries of heterogeneous classes and social groups, including some of the poorest, to a revolt against liberal civilization, with its pluralist and democratic norms.”
“Historical fascism reposed its trust in myth. Disaster nationalism, coming of age in the era of the internet, trusts in the simulacrum.”