Solstad’s novel has the beguiling premise of being an assemblage of footnotes towards the novel he might have written. Might have written in so far as - there might be a novel which exits but will never be read to which these footnotes belong, or the novel might just have existed in his imagination (in which case could it be said to exist or not?). This playful premise would seem to open the door for non-linearity, deviations, Mornington Crescent. Which it does, to an extent, even if a surprisingly coherent narrative emerges of a man who studied the sciences, then got married, had a child, became a diplomat, separated, married again (this is less clear), had a son who as a young man chose to join the army, against type and his father’s wishes, and then suffered an accident meaning the father has to take care of the son in spite of their distanced relationship. As this storyline suggests, there is a determined narrative running through the novel, even if it is only told partially, with gaps. The novel also cleaves to that other shibboleth, character, with Armand, the diplomat, emerging as a strong, complex protagonist. All of which left this reader hankering after more disconnect than the novel provides, perhaps. It’s a staccato read, as some sequences of footnotes arrive in a rush and other footnotes are extended over several pages, including a brilliant account of Armand perceiving the head of a US ambassador as a pig’s head, in the gents of a gilded London venue. This is worth the price of entrance alone, albeit there is the lingering sense that Solstad is sketching out an idea which might have produced a more radical book than it does.
No comments:
Post a Comment