Somewhere in this production is a really fine play trying to
get out. I saw it in the preview week, with the actors still clearly finding
their feet. No doubt they will get there. The key issue regarding its success
relates to how this carefully calibrated tale is directed: exactly what is the
correct pitch for what is essentially a two-hander about marriage and mental
illness, with the title something of a red herring.
The play’s premise, established in the opening scene, is
that Douglas has walked out on his family and his wife. Julie and their son,
Thomas, have no idea where he is or when he’s coming back. In contrast to the
set design’s rigorous (and predictable) naturalism, the play retains an almost
absurdist opaqueness. We’re never told exactly how long Douglas has been
missing. When he does re-appear, the details of his time away are revealed
gradually, piece by piece. Is the marginal world he claims to have joined real?
Or is it just an invention of his troubled (haunted) mind?
Penhall’s most famous play, Blue/Orange dealt astutely with
mental illness. As Haunted Child unfolds, the degree of Douglas’s un-hingedness
becomes ever clearer. The writing handles this beautifully; the layers are
peeled away over the course of a couple of days. Douglas hovers on the brink of
normality, the normality of marriage and fatherhood. In a Europe where despair
seems to be nagging at the heels of whole swathes of society, having a good
job and a nice home is no longer sufficient to ward off the demons, and
Penhall’s portrayal of Douglas feels frighteningly prescient.
It’s the exploration of this tension within Douglas, between
the lure of a kind of asocial madness and the comforts of societal norms, which
should elevate the play beyond being merely an enjoyable, entertaining piece of
storytelling. However, at times it feels as though the direction is working
against the play’s subtler instincts. Whilst there’s a great deal of humour in
the text, it felt as though there was a tendency to overplay the laughs,
thereby dissipating the play’s tension and undercutting its power. Like his
son, the audience needs to be genuinely spooked by the transformation in this
strange, sad man. He’s Banquo’s ghost writ large, the spectre in our
never-ending festival of consumer delights, the man who would renounce the
world and all its ersatz, earthly pleasures.
1 comment:
I share your overall assessment of this play; but having read the play, think it is the writing rather than the direction that doesn't allow 'a fine play to get out'. I think it attempts to tackle too many things and, in doing so, produces a baffling play.
Post a Comment