Showing posts with label renoir madrid. Show all posts
Showing posts with label renoir madrid. Show all posts

Monday, 1 November 2021

titane (w&d julia ducournau)

Interesting to see Titane after having seen two Carax films recently. Titane feels as though it’s the bastard child of Carax, who in turn is the bastard child of high-Godard. Perhaps throwing a few garlands in the direction of Clare Dennis whilst we’re at it. Which is perhaps another way of saying that the film, for all its stylised violence and energetic gender politics, has a classically French feel. It is a dislocated narrative of the image, rather than the coherent narrative of story. Even the unifying structural line, which is Alexia’s pregnancy, is constantly interrupted by scenes where she doesn’t appear to be in the least bit pregnant, contrasted with other scenes where her pregnant belly is displayed in all its glory.

The effect is a film which is stitched together by image and shock. A Rumsfeldian bravura, which is at its goriest in the opening half hour. The audience is rapidly crowbarred into submission and thereafter meekly surrenders to the director’s caprices. We just want to get out unscathed and whenever the tone changes towards something that hints of warmth or humanity, we are duly grateful.

Through this there emerges the line of Alexia’s complex (to say the least) relationship with the automobile. Which firstly scars her for life, then goads her into killing, seduces her and finally becomes the father of her child. This child, like Alexia, is far from standard operating procedure. The child will be a hybrid, part machine, part human, like Alexia herself. On one level Titane could be viewed as an eco parable - this is what our petrolised world has done to humanity, ripping out the love. Or it could also be read, conversely, as a paean to the dying petro-culture, the sleek, erotic age of the car, which is on the wane. There is also, clearly, many a dissertation to be written on Alexia’s pregnancy, the film’s elemental treatment of a process which rarely gets the cinematic dues it deserves. Titane´s capacity for interpretation, its openness, is part of its Gallic appeal.

Finally, a feeling which was exacerbated by walking through the Reina Sofia the following day, Titane also belongs to a surrealist tradition. Bending the framework of the body to fit the artist’s vision of a world which has become disconnected from its natural roots. A hundred years ago, as the world entered a period of terrible change, surrealism emerged as a methodology for communicating what it was like to inhabit this change. Now, in an era of bio-politics and gender fluidity, all the old certainties of liberalism going up in smoke, perhaps surrealism once again is the most exact science for seeking to engage with our brave new world. 

Tuesday, 26 October 2021

annette (w&d carax, w. ron & russell mael)

Two hours twenty minutes of film-opera. In a Madrid cinema called the Renoir with uncomfortable chairs, (supposed to be comfortable), still adjusting to a lost night’s transatlantic sleep and a return to the old continent for the first time in 18 months. To be confronted with Carax going the other way, making a Hollywood movie in unspoken English. It might not have been the ideal way to watch Annette, a movie whose pretensions of mystery are undercut by the banality of its narrative and the manner in which the director forces his agenda on the audience. No matter how hard he tries, Adam Driver as Henry McHenry never really comes across as having any evil in him, which means his daughter’s assertion that he kills people doesn’t feel entirely convincing, in spite of anything the plot seeks to say. Everything, including the songs, feels laboured, a wet tea-towel of a simple idea wrung out for every drop of moisture that can be extracted. It’s not that the movie doesn’t flirt with brilliance, it’s just that it doesn’t achieve it. Perhaps if the seats has been kinder and the conditions more conducive, or if I was younger and less jaded, I might not have been left so cold, but as we discussed it with Señor O, walking back through a glorious Madrileño afternoon, it felt as though this was a movie with a personal agenda so marked it’s as though the director is crying his eyes out in the seat next to you. No matter how much you want to sympathise or empathise or engage, this is distracting. All the more so as it never feels as though the movie gives any one else any kind of emotional entry point.